Method for classifying an obstacle by means of pre-crash sensor signals

ABSTRACT

A method of classifying an obstacle on the basis of pre-crash sensor signals is described, acceleration and acceleration change being determined from the obstacle velocity, and the obstacle is classified on the basis of these parameters. The deployment algorithm is tightened as a function of this classification; if appropriate, restraining means are deployed at an early stage and an automatic braking and/or steering intervention takes place.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

[0001] The present invention is directed to a method of classifying an obstacle on the basis of pre-crash sensor signals according to the definition of the species in the independent claim.

[0002] The placement of radar sensors in side doors of a motor vehicle in order to determine the velocity of an obstacle by using these radar sensors as pre-crash sensors is known from German Unexamined Patent Application 198 03 068 A. This makes it possible to determine an ideal point in time for the deployment of side airbags.

ADVANTAGES OF THE INVENTION

[0003] The method according to the present invention of classifying an obstacle on the basis of pre-crash sensor signals having the features of the independent claim has the advantage over the related art of making an improved obstacle classification possible by considering parameters such as obstacle velocity, acceleration, and acceleration change. This makes optimum utilization of restraining means possible since, by considering these parameters, a more accurate estimation with regard to the type of a probable obstacle is possible.

[0004] Advantageous improvements on the method of classifying an obstacle on the basis of pre-crash sensor signals described in the independent claim are possible by using the measures and refinements listed in the dependent claims.

[0005] It is particularly advantageous that the deployment algorithm for the restraining means has an improved deployment performance due to the improved obstacle classification, which makes an ideal point in time for deployment of the restraining means possible. It is an additional advantage that the obstacle classification makes an automatic braking or steering intervention possible which is decided on the basis of different stored data. This may then contribute to an accident avoidance.

[0006] Furthermore, it is an advantage that active pedestrian protection is possible due to the improved obstacle classification, since a pedestrian is identifiable as an obstacle, and thus restraining means, for example, which are attached to the outer shell of the vehicle, such as a pedestrian airbag, may be optimally deployed.

[0007] Finally, it is also an advantage that a device for the implementation of the method according to the present invention is provided which has a processor for the implementation of the method according to the present invention and which may be connected to an actuator for the steering or braking interventions and to the pedestrian protection means, i.e., the outer airbags.

DRAWING

[0008] Exemplary embodiments of the present invention are illustrated in the drawing and are explained in greater detail in the following description. FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a device according to the present invention, and FIG. 2 shows a flowchart of the method according to the present invention.

DESCRIPTION

[0009] The severity of an accident caused by an impact is determined by the type and the velocity of obstacles. According to the present invention, an obstacle is classified on the basis of pre-crash sensor signals by determining the obstacle velocity, acceleration, and acceleration change. An ideal point in time for the deployment of restraining means and the utilization of pedestrian protection means or an active intervention in the driving operation are thus ultimately possible for accident avoidance.

[0010]FIG. 1 shows the device according to the present invention in a block diagram. A pre-crash sensor 1 is connected to a data input of a signal processing unit 2. Signal processing unit 2 is connected to a processor 3 via a data output. Processor 3 is connected to a memory 4 via a data input/output. Processor 1 is connected to a signal processing unit 5 via a first data output. Processor 3 is connected to a signal processing unit 7 via a second data output. The data output of signal processing unit 5 is connected to restraining means 6. The data output of signal processing unit 7 is connected to an actuator 8. Actuator 8 is used for active interventions in the driving operation, i.e., steering intervention and/or braking intervention.

[0011] A radar sensor is used here as a pre-crash sensor transmitting and receiving electromagnetic radiation in the millimeter range. It is also possible to use an ultrasonic sensor or a video sensor instead of a radar sensor. It is also possible to utilize a plurality of such sensors, or even a combination of different sensors.

[0012] Data from radar sensor 1, which outputs a digital data stream which in turn is pre-processed for processor 3 by signal processing unit 2, enables processor 3 to determine the velocity of the obstacle. The relative velocity between the obstacle and the vehicle is determinable from the pre-crash sensor signals. By knowing the velocity of the vehicle itself, the velocity of the obstacle toward the vehicle is now determinable. After an obstacle has been detected by the vehicle, the pre-crash sensor may track its further motion, i.e., a tracking of the object takes place. The tracking data may then be used for the classification of the object. By considering the vehicle velocity, the object velocity and its change over time, i.e., the acceleration, may be determined. The acceleration of the obstacle, as well as the acceleration change of the obstacle is determinable via a derivative of the velocity of the obstacle (=object) over time. The distance traveled is determined by integration of the velocity of the obstacle.

[0013] For its calculations processor 3 uses memory 4, in particular for storing intermediate results. If the velocity of the obstacle is zero, then it is presumably a stationary object and an impact may be avoided via a simple steering intervention, for example. At a low or non-existent velocity a braking intervention may also take place depending on the probable braking distance.

[0014] However, if an impact is unavoidable, then appropriate restraining means, such as airbags and seat belt tensioners, may be deployed at an early stage in order to ensure passenger protection. If the velocity amounts to a maximum of up to 30 km/h and the acceleration is relatively low, then it can be assumed that the obstacle is probably a pedestrian. It is possible here to lower the velocity limit even further, since only few pedestrians are able to reach 30 km/h.

[0015] If an impact on the pedestrian can no longer be avoided, then outer airbags may be triggered for the pedestrian in order to provide optimum protection for the pedestrian and to minimize injuries.

[0016] In general, if an impact can no longer be avoided, the appropriate thresholds in the deployment algorithm for the restraining means, calculated in processor 3, are lowered in order to achieve tightening of the deployment algorithm so that, even in the case of measuring signals having a low amplitude, the deployment algorithm indicates deployment of restraining means 6.

[0017] If it has been determined that there is neither a fixed obstacle nor a pedestrian, but a vehicle, then appropriate steering interventions and/or restraining means are utilized.

[0018]FIG. 2 shows the method according to the present invention in a flow chart. In method step 9, the pre-crash signals are picked up by pre-crash sensor 1 and transmitted in the form of digital data to signal processing unit 2 which prepares the data for processor 3. Processor 3 calculates velocity, acceleration, and acceleration change in method step 10. The obstacle classification takes place on the basis of these parameters.

[0019] It is now checked in method step 11 whether there is a fixed object according to the obstacle classification. If this is the case, then appropriate protective measures take place in method step 12, i.e., either a steering intervention, or an early deployment of restraining means, but the deployment thresholds in the deployment algorithm are always lowered in order to achieve tightening of the deployment algorithm.

[0020] If it has been determined in method step 11 that there is no fixed object, then it is checked in method step 13 whether the obstacle classification, i.e., method step 10, has identified a pedestrian. If this is the case, then an appropriate protective measure is implemented in method step 14, i.e., either an evasion maneuver or triggering of an outer airbag.

[0021] If it has been determined in method step 13 that there is neither a pedestrian nor a fixed obstacle, but a moving object, i.e., a vehicle, then appropriate protective measures are implemented in method step 15, i.e., tightening of the deployment algorithm and, as the case may be, the early triggering of restraining means, or active interventions in the driving operation, i.e., steering interventions or braking interventions. Actuator 8 is utilized for this purpose. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of classifying an obstacle on the basis of pre-crash sensor signals, a relative velocity between the vehicle and the obstacle being determined from the pre-crash sensor signals, the obstacle velocity being determined from the relative velocity and the vehicle velocity, wherein an acceleration and an acceleration change are determined from the obstacle velocity, and the obstacle is classified on the basis of the acceleration, the acceleration change and the obstacle velocity.
 2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein a deployment algorithm for restraining means is adjusted as a function of the obstacle classification.
 3. The method as recited in claim 2, wherein restraining means are deployed as a function of the adjustment of the deployment algorithm prior to an impact with the obstacle.
 4. The method as recited in claim 1, 2, or 3, wherein an automatic braking intervention and/or steering intervention takes place as a function of the obstacle classification.
 5. The method as recited in one of the preceding claims, wherein pedestrian protection means are deployed as a function of the obstacle classification.
 6. A device for implementing the method as recited in one of claims 1 through 4, wherein the device has at least a pre-crash sensor (1), a processor (3) for analyzing the pre-crash signals, and restraining means (6), provided the restraining means (6) are connectable to the processor (3).
 7. The device as recited in claim 6, wherein the device has an actuator (8) for a braking intervention and/or a steering intervention.
 8. The device as recited in claim 5 and 6, wherein the device is connectable to pedestrian protection means. 